BIR's Kim Henares coddles and lawyers for tax evader!
Philippines’s
Bureau of Internal Revenue Commissioner Kim Henares, who established a
reputation that of an unyielding tax-evader-buster, coddles and lawyers for Philippine
Daily Inquirer (PDI) Chair Marixi Rufino-Prieto firm Golden Donuts, Inc. (GDI),
the exclusive Philippine Franchisee of the global brand “Dunkin’ Donuts” – a
bigtime tax evader.
Othello E.
Dalanon, in his official capacity as former BIR Revenue Officer, conducted
investigation of the 2007 financial records of GDI for internal revenue tax
purposes where he discovered and documented irregularities perpetrated by the
said company that culminated in the tax assessment amounting to PhP 1.56
billion, including increments.
Dalanon
personally reported GDI’s omissions to Commissioner Henares and recommended to
her the criminal prosecution for tax evasion under the much-vaunted “Run After
Tax Evaders” (RATE) Program of the Bureau; but she intentionally failed to
pursue fraud case against the said company because its secretary – Marixi
Rufino-Prieto who also happens to be the Chairperson of Philippine Daily
Inquirer (PDI) – is President BS Aquino 3rd’s friend.
The
aforesaid deficiency tax assessment obtained finality because GDI failed to
file a VALID PROTEST against the Formal Letter of Demand and Assessment Notice
(FAN).
However,
Henares intentionally did not enforce collection thereof, purportedly because
representatives of GDI complained to her that Dalanon’s tax assessment against
the said company was allegedly faulty; that is why she ordered two (2)
re-investigations conducted by different groups of revenue officers who
supposedly arrived at similar results, finding Dalanon’s assessment to be
incorrect, she said.
There is no
LAW that authorizes the Commissioner to order two (2) re-investigations of a
FINAL, EXECUTORY and DEMANDABLE assessment.
Once the
deficiency tax assessment obtained finality, the right of the government to
collect the deficiency tax becomes absolute; thus, precludes the taxpayer from
questioning the correctness of the assessment and from raising any
justification or defense that would pave the way for a re-investigation.
Notwithstanding
the ensuing finality of the said assessment, the Commissioner allowed such
re-investigations.
The “first re-investigation”,
which is no longer warranted because Dalanon’s tax assessment which remained
undisturbed after review and evaluation conducted by high-ranking officers in
the district and regional levels of the agency, and already covered by Formal
Letter of Demand and Assessment Notices (FANs) bearing Demand No. 41-B072-07 and
all dated October 29, 2010 obtained finality, was assigned to Revenue Officer
Stanley Ong, under Group Supervisor Gregorio S. Tumanguil, who was the same
revenue officer that conducted the review of the case and recommended for the
issuance of the statutory notices of assessment (PAN and FAN) when he was yet
with the Assessment Division of the Regional Office in Quezon City.
Former Revenue
Officer Dalanon is not a lawyer though he believes that Revenue Officer Stanley
Ong who conducted the “first re-investigation” could no longer disturb the
former’s tax assessment for reasons of principle of estoppel. The equitable
principle of estoppel forbids the latter, who conducted the “first re-investigation”,
from taking inconsistent position against his concurrence to the former’s
original audit findings that culminated in the deficiency tax assessment
amounting to PhP 1.56-B which is already FINAL, EXECUTORY and DEMANDABLE but
which was re-investigated by no other than Revenue Officer Ong himself.
The “second re-investigation”,
which is also no longer necessary as Dalanon’s tax assessment obtained
finality, was referred to Atty. Grace Cruz of the National Investigation Division
in the National Office of the BIR. Dalanon strongly admires Atty. Cruz of her
investigative expertise in administrative cases. Lest it be misconstrued.
Dalanon is not saying that Atty. Cruz is short of proficiency in tax accounting
and tax auditing. No result of re-investigation was submitted by Atty. Cruz.
So, how can
Henares claim that her groups of revenue officers who conducted the supposed
two (2) separate re-investigations came up with the same findings that
Dalanon’s assessment against GDI was incorrect?
Henares also
claims that the authority to decide and declare finality of a certain
assessment is a function vested by law upon the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue.
Her
assertion does not find basis in LAW.
It is the
LAW that determines finality of a certain assessment as clearly provided under
Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 12-99 as amended by RR No. 18-2013 which the
Commissioner herself promulgated, in relation to Section 228 of the 1997
National Internal Revenue Code (1997 Tax Code), as amended.
Just to
reiterate. The P1.56 billion tax deficit of GDI “Dunkin’ Donuts” has become DUE
and DEMANDABLE, thus, it already legally belongs to the FILIPINO people; but
Henares intentionally did not collect.
Atty. Kim Henares, just tell the truth and nothing
but the truth!!!
Othello E
Dalanon
0 Mga Komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento
Mag-subscribe sa I-post ang Mga Komento [Atom]
<< Home